Parental obesity predisposes offspring to kidney dysfunction and increased susceptibility to ischemia-reperfusion injury in a sex-dependent manner.

Although obesity is recognized as a risk factor for cardiorenal and metabolic diseases, the impact of parental obesity on the susceptibility of their offspring to renal injury at adulthood is unknown. We examined the impact of parental obesity on offspring kidney function, morphology, and markers of kidney damage after acute kidney injury (AKI). Offspring from normal (N) diet-fed C57BL/6J parents were fed either N (NN) or a high-fat (H) diet (NH) from weaning until adulthood. Offspring from obese H diet-fed parents were fed N (HN) or H diet (HH) after weaning. All offspring groups were submitted to bilateral AKI by clamping the left and right renal pedicles for 30 min. Compared with male NH and NN offspring from lean parents, male HH and HN offspring from obese parents exhibited higher kidney injury markers such as urinary, renal osteopontin, plasma creatinine, urinary albumin excretion, and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) levels, and worse histological injury score at 22 wk of age. Only albumin excretion and NGAL were elevated in female HH offspring from obese parents compared with lean and obese offspring from lean parents. We also found an increased mortality rate and worse kidney injury scores after AKI in male offspring from obese parents, regardless of the diet consumed after weaning. Female offspring were protected from major kidney injury after AKI. These results indicate that parental obesity leads to increased kidney injury in their offspring after ischemia-reperfusion in a sex-dependent manner, even when their offspring remain lean.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Offspring from obese parents are more susceptible to kidney injury and worse outcomes following an acute ischemia-reperfusion insult. Male, but not female, offspring from obese parents exhibit increased blood pressure early in life. Female offspring are partially protected against major kidney injury induced by ischemia-reperfusion.

Documento de consenso de la Asociación Española para el Estudio del Hígado sobre el tratamiento de la infección por el virus de la hepatitis B (2020) / Consensus document of the Spanish Association for Study of the Liver on the treatment of hepatitis B virus infection (2020)

La infección por el virus de la hepatitis B (VHB) continúa siendo un problema global de salud pública. La vacunación frente al VHB, introducida en España en la década de 1990, constituye el método más eficaz para reducir la incidencia de la enfermedad. No obstante, la migración procedente de países donde la prevalencia de la infección es alta contribuye a que en nuestro país la tasa esté aún entre el 0,5 y el 1%. El espectro de la enfermedad crónica ocasionada por el VHB es muy variable y abarca desde el portador inactivo a pacientes con hepatitis crónica, cirrosis y carcinoma hepatocelular. A pesar de que en los últimos años no se han producido grandes avances en el desarrollo clínico de nuevos fármacos para el tratamiento de la hepatitis B crónica, los cambios en la epidemiología, en el conocimiento de la historia natural, métodos diagnósticos e indicaciones de tratamiento aconsejan la actualización del documento de consenso de la Asociación Española para el Estudio del Hígado (AEEH) sobre el tratamiento de la infección por el VHB publicado en el año 2012. El documento de la AEEH revisa el tratamiento de la hepatitis B crónica y establece como mejor pauta la administración prolongada de un análogo de nucleós(t)ido con alta barrera genética a la resistencia (entecavir, tenofovir o tenofovir alafenamida). El interferón-pegilado constituye una alternativa en pacientes con enfermedad hepática poco avanzada, pero su aplicabilidad es limitada por su baja eficacia y efectos adversos frecuentes. En todos los pacientes se debe evaluar el riesgo de progresión a enfermedad hepática avanzada y de desarrollo de carcinoma hepatocelular. Determinados subgrupos de pacientes con infección crónica por VHB deben ser incluidos en programas de vigilancia para el diagnóstico precoz de carcinoma hepatocelular, que constituye en el momento actual la principal complicación de la enfermedad

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a global public health problem. HBV vaccination is the most effective tool to reduce the incidence of HBV disease. Despite there has not been new clinical developments for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in the last few years, changing epidemiology and current insights on natural history, diagnostic tools and therapy indications make necessary an update of the former version of the consensus document of the Spanish Association for Study of the Liver on the treatment of hepatitis B infection published in 2012. The current document updates the management of chronic hepatitis B. The treatment of choice is the long-term administration of a nucleos(t)ide analogue with high barrier to resistance (entecavir, tenofovir or tenofovir alafenamide). Pegylated interferon may be an option in patients with non-advanced liver disease, but its applicability is limited due to the low efficacy and poor tolerability. All patients must be monitored for the risk of progression to advanced liver disease and development of hepatocellular carcinoma

Consensus document of the Spanish Association for Study of the Liver on the treatment of hepatitis B virus infection (2020). / Documento de consenso de la Asociación Española para el Estudio del Hígado sobre el tratamiento de la infección por el virus de la hepatitis B (2020).

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a global public health problem. HBV vaccination is the most effective tool to reduce the incidence of HBV disease. Despite there has not been new clinical developments for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in the last few years, changing epidemiology and current insights on natural history, diagnostic tools and therapy indications make necessary an update of the former version of the consensus document of the Spanish Association for Study of the Liver on the treatment of hepatitis B infection published in 2012. The current document updates the management of chronic hepatitis B. The treatment of choice is the long-term administration of a nucleos(t)ide analogue with high barrier to resistance (entecavir, tenofovir or tenofovir alafenamide). Pegylated interferon may be an option in patients with non-advanced liver disease, but its applicability is limited due to the low efficacy and poor tolerability. All patients must be monitored for the risk of progression to advanced liver disease and development of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatitis B surface antigen loss after discontinuing nucleos(t)ide analogue for treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients is persistent in White patients.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the long-term clinical outcome and persistence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss after discontinuation of treatment. BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treated with nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) who discontinue treatment after loss of HBsAg remains largely unknown, particularly in White patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed a cohort of patients with CHB who discontinued NA treatment after loss of HBsAg. A total of 69 patients with hepatitis-B-e antigen-positive or hepatitis-B-e antigen-negative CHB with undetectable HBsAg during NA treatment were included after discontinuation of treatment, and followed up for a median period of 37.8 months (interquartile range: 23.8-54.6 months). RESULTS: At the end of follow-up, none of the patients showed spontaneous reappearance of HBsAg and only one patient had detectable hepatitis B virus DNA (22 IU/ml). Another patient negative for HBsAg and anti-HBs developed hepatitis B virus reactivation without elevated transaminases after treatment with corticosteroids and vincristine for dendritic cell neoplasm, 38 months after withdrawal of the antiviral treatment. Regarding clinical outcome, a patient with cirrhosis developed hepatocellular carcinoma, 6.6 years after discontinuing treatment. None of the patients had hepatic decompensation or underwent liver transplantation. CONCLUSION: HBsAg clearance after discontinuing NAs in patients with CHB is persistent and associated with good prognosis. The risk for developing hepatocellular carcinoma persists among patients with cirrhosis.

Correction: Randomized prospective study evaluating tenofovir disoproxil fumarate prophylaxis against hepatitis B virus reactivation in anti-HBc-positive patients with rituximab-based regimens to treat hematologic malignancies: The Preblin study.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184550.].

Hypoalgesic effects of three different manual therapy techniques on cervical spine and psychological interaction: A randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the extent to which psychological factors interact with a particular manual therapy (MT) technique to induce hypoalgesia in healthy subjects. METHODS: Seventy-five healthy volunteers (36 female, 39 males), were recruited in this double-blind, controlled and parallel study. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive: High velocity low amplitude technique (HVLA), joint mobilization, or Cervical Lateral glide mobilization (CLGM). Pressure pain threshold (PPT) over C7 unilaterally, trapezius muscle and lateral epicondyle bilaterally, were measured prior to single technique MT was applied and immediately after to applied MT. Pain catastrophizing, depression, anxiety and kinesiophobia were evaluated before treatment. RESULTS: The results indicate that hypoalgesia was observed in all groups after treatment in the neck and elbow region (P < 0.05), but mobilization induces more hypoalgesic effects. Catastrophizing interacted with change over time in PPT, for changes in C7 and in manipulation group. CONCLUSIONS: All the MT techniques studied produced local and segmental hypoalgesic effects, supporting the results of previous studies studying the individual interventions. Interaction between catastrophizing and HVLA technique suggest that whether catastrophizing level is low or medium, the chance of success is high, but high levels of catastrophizing may result in poor outcome after HVLA intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Registration Number: NCT02782585.

Randomized prospective study evaluating tenofovir disoproxil fumarate prophylaxis against hepatitis B virus reactivation in anti-HBc-positive patients with rituximab-based regimens to treat hematologic malignancies: The Preblin study.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in patients with resolved HBV infection (HBsAg negative, antiHBc positive) is uncommon, but potentially fatal. The role of HBV prophylaxis in this setting is uncertain. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) prophylaxis versus close monitoring in antiHBc-positive, HBsAg-negative patients under treatment with rituximab (RTX)-based regimens for hematologic malignancy. METHODS: PREBLIN is a phase IV, randomized, prospective, open-label, multicenter, parallel-group trial conducted in 17 hospitals throughout Spain. Anti-HBc-positive, HBsAg-negative patients with undetectable HBV DNA were randomized to receive TDF 300 mg once daily (Group I) or observation (Group II). The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients showing HBV reactivation during 18 months following initiation of RTX treatment. Patients with detectable HBV DNA (Group III) received the same dose of TDF and were analyzed together with Group I to investigate TDF safety. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were enrolled in the study, 33 in the TDF treatment group and 28 in the observation group. By ITT analysis, HBV reactivation was 0% (0/33) in the study group and 10.7% (3/28) in the observation group (p = 0.091). None of the patients in either group showed significant differences in liver function parameters between baseline and the last follow-up sample. TDF was generally well tolerated and there were no severe treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: In patients with hematological malignancy and resolved hepatitis B infection receiving RTX-based regimens, HBV reactivation did not occur in patients given TDF prophylaxis.

Effectiveness and Safety of Entecavir or Tenofovir in a Spanish Cohort of Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: Validation of the Page-B Score to Predict Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Long-term antiviral therapy has resulted in viral suppression and biochemical response in chronic hepatitis B, although the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma has not been abolished. The Page-B score could be useful to estimate the probability of HCC. AIMS: To analyze the effectiveness and safety of entecavir or tenofovir for more than 4 years and the usefulness of Page-B score in the real-world setting. METHODS: Analysis of Caucasian chronic hepatitis B subjects treated with entecavir or tenofovir from the prospective, multicenter database CIBERHEP. RESULTS: A total of 611 patients were enrolled: 187 received entecavir and 424 tenofovir. Most were men, mean age 50 years, 32% cirrhotic and 16.5% HBeAg-positive. Mean follow-up was 55 (entecavir) and 49 (tenofovir) months. >90% achieved HBV DNA <69 IU/mL and biochemical normalization by months 12 and 36, respectively. Cumulative HBeAg loss and anti-HBe seroconversion were achieved by 33.7 and 23.8%. Four patients lost HBsAg; three HBeAg-positive. Renal function remained stable on long-term follow-up. Fourteen (2.29%) developed HCC during follow-up all of them with baseline Page-B ≥10. Nine were diagnosed within the first 5 years of therapy. This contrasts with the 27 estimated by Page-B, a difference that highlights the importance of regular HCC surveillance even in patients with virological suppression. CONCLUSIONS: Entecavir and tenofovir achieved high biochemical and virological response. Renal function remained stable with both drugs. A Page-B cut-off ≥10 selected all patients at risk of HCC development.

Trombosis portal: más allá de la cirrosis hepática / Portal thrombosis: Beyond liver cirrhosis

No disponible

Hepatobiliary manifestations in inflammatory bowel disease: the gut, the drugs and the liver.

Abnormal liver biochemical tests are present in up to 30% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and therefore become a diagnostic challenge. Liver and biliary tract diseases are common extraintestinal manifestations for both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis (UC), and typically do not correlate with intestinal activity. Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is the most common hepatobiliary manifestation of IBD, and is more prevalent in UC. Approximately 5% of patients with UC develop PSC, with the prevalence reaching up to 90%. Cholangiocarcinoma and colon cancer risks are increased in these patients. Less common disorders include autoimmune hepatitis/PSC overlap syndrome, IgG4-associated cholangiopathy, primary biliary cirrhosis, hepatic amyloidosis, granulomatous hepatitis, cholelithiasis, portal vein thrombosis, liver abscess, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatitis B reactivation during immunosuppressive therapy is a major concern, with screening and vaccination being recommended in serologically negative cases for patients with IBD. Reactivation prophylaxis with entecavir or tenofovir for 6 to 12 mo after the end of immunosuppressive therapy is mandatory in patients showing as hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive, independently from viral load. HBsAg negative and anti-HBc positive patients, with or without anti-HBs, should be closely monitored, measuring alanine aminotransferase and hepatitis B virus DNA within 12 mo after the end of therapy, and should be treated if the viral load increases. On the other hand, immunosuppressive therapy does not seem to promote reactivation of hepatitis C, and hepatitis C antiviral treatment does not influence IBD natural history either. Most of the drugs used for IBD treatment may induce hepatotoxicity, although the incidence of serious adverse events is low. Abnormalities in liver biochemical tests associated with aminosalicylates are uncommon and are usually not clinically relevant. Methotrexate-related hepatotoxicity has been described in 14% of patients with IBD, in a dose-dependent manner. Liver biopsy is not routinely recommended. Biologics-related hepatotoxicity is rare, but has been shown most frequently in patients treated with infliximab. Thiopurines have been associated with veno-occlusive disease, regenerative nodular hyperplasia, and liver peliosis. Routine liver biochemical tests are recommended, especially during the first month of treatment. All these conditions should be considered in IBD patients with clinical or biochemical features suggestive of hepatobiliary involvement. Diagnosis and management of these disorders usually involve hepatologists and gastroenterologists due to its complexity.

[Virological response to adefovir dipivoxil predicts the long-term development of resistance in previously untreated patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B]. / La respuesta virológica al tratamiento con adefovir dipivoxil predice el desarrollo de resistencias a largo plazo en pacientes con hepatitis crónica B HBeAg negativo previamente no tratados.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Adefovir dipivoxil monotherapy in lamivudine-resistant patients is associated with more frequent development of resistance than in naïve patients. The virological response during treatment predicts the risk of developing resistance. The aims of this study were to assess the efficacy of adefovir dipivoxil treatment in naïve and lamivudine-resistant patients and to determine whether virological response predicts the development of adefovir resistance. PATIENTS AND METHOD: This study included 82 patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who received adefovir dipivoxil therapy. During active treatment, HBV-DNA values were determined by polymerase chain reaction; in addition, the presence of adefovir resistance-associated mutations was studied in cases of virological breakthrough. RESULTS: Virological response at 12 and 24 months was 59% and 73% in naive patients compared with 40% and 67% in lamivudine-resistant patients, whereas virological breakthrough at 24 months was 9.5% in naïve patients compared with 20% in lamivudine-resistant patients. A small percentage (4%) of patients with virological response at 12 months showed virological breakthrough between 12 and 40 months versus 29.4% of patients without virological response (P=.03). In lamivudine-resistant patients, virological response at 12 months was not a predictive factor for the development of virological breakthrough. CONCLUSIONS: Adefovir dipivoxil monotherapy in lamivudine-resistant patients is associated with an increased tendency to develop virological breakthrough, which cannot be predicted by virological response at 12 months of treatment. In naive patients, an undetectable viral load at 12 months of treatment ensures the absence of virological breakthrough at 40 months of treatment.

La respuesta virológica al tratamiento con adefovir dipivoxil predice el desarrollo de resistencias a largo plazo en pacientes con hepatitis crónica B HBeAg negativo previamente no tratados / Virological response to adefovir dipivoxil predicts the long-term development of resistance in previously untreated patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B

Fundamento y objetivo La monoterapia con adefovir dipivoxil en pacientes resistentes a lamivudina se asocia con mayor desarrollo de resistencias que en naive. La respuesta virológica durante el tratamiento predice el riesgo de resistencias. Los objetivos de este estudio son evaluar la eficacia del tratamiento con adefovir dipivoxil en pacientes naive y resistentes a lamivudina y valorar si la respuesta virológica predice el desarrollo de resistencias a adefovir. Pacientes y metodo Se ha incluido a 82 pacientes con hepatitis crónica B (HCB) HBeAg negativo tratados con adefovir dipivoxil. Durante el tratamiento se determinó ADNVHB por reacción en cadena de la polimerasa y en los casos de breakthrough virológico, se estudió la presencia de mutaciones asociadas a resistencia a adefovir. Resultados La respuesta virológica a los 12 y 24 meses fue del 59 y el 73% en naive y del 40 y el 67% en resistentes a lamivudina. El breakthrough virológico a los 24 meses fue del 9,5% en naive y el 20% en resistentes a lamivudina. El 4% de los naive con respuesta virológica a los 12 meses presentó breakthrough virológico entre 12 y 40 meses de tratamiento frente al 29,4% de los pacientes sin respuesta virológica (p=0,03). En resistentes a lamivudina la respuesta virológica a los 12 meses no predijo el breakthrough virológico. Conclusiones La monoterapia con adefovir dipivoxil en pacientes resistentes a lamivudina se asocia con mayor tendencia al desarrollo de breakthrough virológico no predecible por la respuesta virológica a los 12 meses de tratamiento. En pacientes naive la carga viral no detectable a los 12 meses de tratamiento predice la ausencia de breakthrough virológico hasta los 40 meses de tratamiento (AU)

Background and objective Adefovir dipivoxil monotherapy in lamivudine-resistant patients is associated with more frequent development of resistance than in naïve patients. The virological response during treatment predicts the risk of developing resistance. The aims of this study were to assess the efficacy of adefovir dipivoxil treatment in naïve and lamivudine-resistant patients and to determine whether virological response predicts the development of adefovir resistance. Patients and method This study included 82 patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who received adefovir dipivoxil therapy. During active treatment, HBV-DNA values were determined by polymerase chain reaction; in addition, the presence of adefovir resistance-associated mutations was studied in cases of virological breakthrough. Results Virological response at 12 and 24 months was 59% and 73% in naive patients compared with 40% and 67% in lamivudine-resistant patients, whereas virological breakthrough at 24 months was 9.5% in naïve patients compared with 20% in lamivudine-resistant patients. A small percentage (4%) of patients with virological response at 12 months showed virological breakthrough between 12 and 40 months versus 29.4% of patients without virological response (P=.03). In lamivudine-resistant patients, virological response at 12 months was not a predictive factor for the development of virological breakthrough. Conclusions Adefovir dipivoxil monotherapy in lamivudine-resistant patients is associated with an increased tendency to develop virological breakthrough, which cannot be predicted by virological response at 12 months of treatment. In naive patients, an undetectable viral load at 12 months of treatment ensures the absence of virological breakthrough at 40 months of treatment (AU)

Tenofovir is effective alone or with emtricitabine in adefovir-treated patients with chronic-hepatitis B virus infection.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We compared treatments for patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection who had an incomplete response to adefovir dipivoxil (ADV). We evaluated a combination of fixed-dose emtricitabine (FTC) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) from the start (early combination) versus TDF as monotherapy. METHODS: Patients (n = 105) were randomly assigned to groups given TDF (n = 53) or FTC/TDF (n = 52). End points included HBV DNA suppression, biochemical and serologic response, and response by baseline or developed resistance mutations through 48 weeks of treatment. Patients given TDF monotherapy had the option to receive FTC, as fixed-dose FTC/TDF, if viremia persisted after week 24. RESULTS: At baseline, patients' mean HBV DNA level was 5.97 log(10) copies/mL, and 58% had received lamivudine (LAM); LAM- and ADV-associated mutations were detected in 13 and 10 patients, respectively, by population sequencing and in 14 and 18 patients, respectively, by reverse hybridization line probe assay (INNO-LiPA HBV DR). Through week 24 (direct comparison of blinded therapy), viral decay curves were identical between groups. At week 48, 81% of patients initially given TDF or TDF/FTC had HBV DNA levels below 400 copies/mL. The presence of baseline LAM- or ADV-associated mutations did not affect response. Adherence to therapy appeared to be the primary factor associated with HBV DNA levels below 400 copies/mL at week 48. CONCLUSIONS: TDF monotherapy and the combination of FTC and TDF had similar efficacy in patients with incomplete viral suppression after therapy with ADV; response was not influenced by the presence of baseline LAM- or ADV-associated mutations. Initial monotherapy followed by combination therapy was as effective as early combination therapy.

Empeoramiento de lesiones de lepra en un paciente filipino / Worsening of leprosy lesions in a Philippine-born patient

No disponible

Insulin resistance impairs sustained response rate to peginterferon plus ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C patients.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We evaluated the effect of insulin resistance and viral factors on sustained virological response in patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with peginterferon plus ribavirin. METHODS: Patients (n=159; 94 men; age, 41.7 +/- 11.1 years) with chronic hepatitis C (genotype 1, n=113; non-1 genotype, n=46) received treatment with interferon plus ribavirin. Serum levels of leptin and insulin were measured, and the insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR: homeostasis model of assessment) and body mass index were calculated. RESULTS: A sustained virological response was associated with lower age, insulin resistance index, body mass index, and gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase and serum leptin levels. There was no association with viral load, sex, type of interferon, or cholesterol levels. A sustained virological response was achieved in 43.4% (46/113) of genotype 1 and 89% (32/36) of genotype 2 and 3 (P=.0001) patients. Necroinflammatory activity and steatosis were not associated with the sustained virological response rate. Multivariate regression analysis indicated that the independent variables related to sustained virological response were genotype (odds ratio, 3.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.49-8.3; P=.001), insulin resistance index (odds ratio, 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-3.06; P=.012), and fibrosis (odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.84; P=.029). A sustained virological response in patients with genotype 1 and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR > 2) occurred in 23 of 70 (32.8%; 95% confidence interval, 21.9%-43.9%) patients, vs. 26 of 43 (60.5%; 95% confidence interval, 45.9%-75.1%) genotype 1 patients without insulin resistance (P=.007; odds ratio, 3.12, 95% confidence interval, 1.42-6.89). CONCLUSIONS: Insulin resistance, fibrosis, and genotype are independent predictors of the response to antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis C patients treated with peginterferon plus ribavirin.